Wanting on the underlying holdings of the ETFs in our protection universe at ETF Channel, now we have in contrast the buying and selling value of every holding towards the typical analyst 12-month ahead goal value, and computed the weighted common implied analyst goal value for the ETF itself. For the John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (Image: JHMM), we discovered that the implied analyst goal value for the ETF based mostly upon its underlying holdings is $69.64 per unit.
With JHMM buying and selling at a current value close to $61.29 per unit, that implies that analysts see 13.62% upside for this ETF wanting by way of to the typical analyst targets of the underlying holdings. Three of JHMM’s underlying holdings with notable upside to their analyst goal costs are Viatris Inc (Image: VTRS), Match Group Inc (Image: MTCH), and Science Functions Worldwide Corp (Image: SAIC). Though VTRS has traded at a current value of $11.39/share, the typical analyst goal is 15.59% larger at $13.17/share. Equally, MTCH has 14.98% upside from the current share value of $32.07 if the typical analyst goal value of $36.88/share is reached, and analysts on common predict SAIC to achieve a goal value of $132.33/share, which is 14.01% above the current value of $116.07. Under is a twelve month value historical past chart evaluating the inventory efficiency of VTRS, MTCH, and SAIC:
Under is a abstract desk of the present analyst goal costs mentioned above:
Title | Image | Current Worth | Avg. Analyst 12-Mo. Goal | % Upside to Goal |
---|---|---|---|---|
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | JHMM | $61.29 | $69.64 | 13.62% |
Viatris Inc | VTRS | $11.39 | $13.17 | 15.59% |
Match Group Inc | MTCH | $32.07 | $36.88 | 14.98% |
Science Functions Worldwide Corp | SAIC | $116.07 | $132.33 | 14.01% |
Are analysts justified in these targets, or overly optimistic about the place these shares will probably be buying and selling 12 months from now? Do the analysts have a legitimate justification for his or her targets, or are they behind the curve on current firm and business developments? A excessive value goal relative to a inventory’s buying and selling value can replicate optimism concerning the future, however may also be a precursor to focus on value downgrades if the targets had been a relic of the previous. These are questions that require additional investor analysis.
10 ETFs With Most Upside To Analyst Targets »
Additionally see:
NTIC market cap history
EHC YTD Return
EVRI Historical Stock Prices
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the writer and don’t essentially replicate these of Nasdaq, Inc.