Comcast Spins Out Cable Networks

Inventory Advisor offers buyers with an easy-to-follow blueprint for achievement, together with steerage on constructing a portfolio, common updates from analysts, and two new inventory picks every month. The Inventory Advisor service has greater than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.

See the 10 stocks »

*Inventory Advisor returns as of November 25, 2024

This video was recorded on Nov. 21, 2024.

Ricky Mulvey: Cable Networks are spinning and also you’re listening to Motley Idiot Cash. I am Ricky Mulvey. Joined at present by returning champion Invoice Barker. Invoice, how are you doing?

Invoice Barker: I am properly. Thanks. How are you?

Ricky Mulvey: I am doing properly. It is good to have you ever again on the present. Have not seen you in a couple of months. We have got a bit of little bit of NVIDIA, after which I need to speak about this Comcast spin off. Dylan’s going to cowl this extra on the Friday present, however it’s the most important firm by Market Cap, or it is constantly buying and selling locations is the most important firm by Market Cap and so they reported earnings yesterday. I feel my huge takeaways are that the information heart enterprise is rolling with income up greater than 100% from the prior yr and that is from a base of fourteen-and-a-half billion. Expectations are beginning to match as much as what they’re doing and a few buyers are doing a bit of revenue taking. What stands out to you about NVIDIA’s quarter?

Invoice Barker: Nicely, it is a phenomenal quarter and as you say expectations have been largely met, and those who figured that NVIDIA at all times exceeds expectations and never solely exceeds them by regular quantities however extreme quantities may discover that this one time NVIDIA has solely exceeded expectations by a traditional quantity and that they’ve crushed expectations and raised steerage however to not the extent that has been happening in some quarters up to now and that is actually a operate of the regulation of enormous numbers. It will get more durable and more durable whenever you begin speaking about quarters involving $37 billion to only be growing issues by an annual fee of 100%.

Ricky Mulvey: Additionally, you get extra eyes when you begin entering into that trillions of {dollars} in market cap for folk to make guesses about what cash you are going to make. One quantity I need to zero in on as a result of I feel that is extremely spectacular for NVIDIA, and quite a lot of buyers imagine it to be spectacular. This can be a firm that makes 75% in gross margin. Have you ever seen something come near that? What’s NVIDIA doing to make that?

Invoice Barker: Nicely, definitely nothing near it when it comes to {hardware} and when it comes to chips, and it is a operate of the demand that they can promote at charges which might be extraordinary. These are gross margin charges above that stage within the software program house will not be unprecedented. However you are speaking about one thing within the 30% or so vary for Intel. I feel their present gross margin is 34% and AMD‘s is 48% and so NVIDIA’s at 75, 76%, that does, as you say a spotlight that they’re doing one thing that their opponents are nowhere near doing.

Ricky Mulvey: I need to get to this Comcast story. That is huge information for media observers, and that is that Comcast is spinning off its cable property, together with USA Community, MSNBC, and CNBC. Spin off is predicted to be valued at about $7 billion, not going to take maintain for a yr, in line with reporting I noticed within the Los Angeles Instances. Earlier than we get into the specifics of why Comcast is doing this, that is one thing that inventory market buyers will expertise typically. I feel it lately occurred with Kellogg spinning off its serial division. It occurred a very long time in the past when GE owned the NBC Common property. Broadly, why do firms spin off departments, even once they’re making a living, making a revenue into new publicly traded firms?

Invoice Barker: There may be quite a lot of causes. On this case I feel it is a capital allocation choice. You’ve got acquired one a part of the corporate, for example, that’s rising however not rising as quick as one other half and that slower rising half would really like the eye of the corporate and wish to have cash thrown its means. They are saying in the event you give us a billion {dollars}, we’ll flip it into 1.1 billion over two years. We are going to develop your funding 10% over two years and there is perhaps one other a part of the corporate that’s saying, properly, you give us a billion {dollars} to enhance our enterprise we’ll do double that.

This can be a means of letting a really unified a part of the corporate, that being the cable channels function with their very own capital allocation selections and show that possibly they might elevate cash from outdoors of the corporate or they’ll make offers with different cable channels that may want a brand new residence in a means that turns into very uninteresting to a really giant firm. That’s, as I feel Charlie Munger or Warren Buffett, possibly Charlie Munger stated to Warren Buffett, if one thing is not value doing in any respect it is not value doing properly. Even in the event you can take a small factor and develop it decently, if it simply would not transfer the needle on a really giant firm, it is like, who cares if you are able to do one thing attention-grabbing? It would not matter to the massive father or mother. You spin one thing off, it is a smaller entity and growing one thing by an affordable share is significant when you determine a small firm that may allocate capital properly.

Ricky Mulvey: Nicely, one factor the massive father or mother definitely cares about is streaming, streaming subscribers and getting individuals to observe Peacock. One might imagine that you might take these cable channels, USA Community, MSNBC, CNBC, and make them play properly in that streaming world. However finally, why do not you suppose that NBCU might make these channels work on this new streaming atmosphere?

Invoice Barker: I feel that quite a lot of the sports activities and information protection they have is consumed dwell sports activities protection, specifically, information protection, possibly much less so. However outdated information is simply not attention-grabbing. To have the ability to without end return and watch the November twenty first version of Cable information chat is just not one thing that many individuals are going to return to. In the event you’ve acquired what Peacock actually is healthier at films and exhibits. You need not watch a present inside a yr, 10, 15 years of when it got here out it is simply nearly as good years later. That is not the case for many of those channels which might be going to be a part of this spin off.

Ricky Mulvey: I feel it is unimaginable to have this dialogue with out mentioning like individuals have additionally misplaced quite a lot of belief in Cable information shops, and when it comes to viewership, they’re slipping viewers a bit of bit. MSNBC shedding viewers after the election of Donald Trump. One might imagine that after what occurred in 2016 you’ll see an enormous spike in cable information viewerships however that is not taking part in out this time. Additionally the median age. The median age for cable information viewership for not simply MSNBC, however Fox Information and CNBC can also be round 70. I’d think about the executives listed here are taking a look at this and saying, what? That is actually costly and we do not suppose we’re grabbing that youthful era of viewers that we need to get onto these streaming platforms.

Invoice Barker: I feel all these information factors are true. I feel MSNBC can also be probably fairly an anchor round Comcast’s neck if it desires to make acquisitions and the administration is hostile to MSNBC for not being sufficiently praising the administration. They could simply do precisely what has been promised, which is to precise retribution on whoever is not on board. I feel that is possibly a consideration however actually these items do not appear to have an interesting future within the present development to Comcast and to many many others.

Ricky Mulvey: Let’s speak in regards to the spin off as a result of the brand new CEO who’s at present the NBCU group chair, Mark Lazarus informed a gaggle of staff, and that is, in line with Los Angeles Instances reporting, “I fully empathize with individuals who suppose that this is able to be a bittersweet factor. I feel it is thrilling as a result of only a few instances in life you’ve got the chance to be a part of what I will name a properly funded begin up.” I feel there’s a solution to make channels like CNBC work in 2024 and seize newer generations of viewers. However how might a gaggle of cable networks operate as a properly funded begin up, is it potential?

Invoice Barker: Nicely, they’ve actual viewers, actual revenues. They’re worthwhile. As a start-up mentality with a brand new horizon to take a look at and we are able to take what we have proper now and rearrange it and make offers with the opposite bundlers. There are many methods to pursue the long run on this enterprise and have on the very least intellectually thrilling time with a altering panorama, and they don’t seem to be in determined want of anyone to fund them. They have worthwhile operations. Look, he is clearly spinning issues too. He is saying that he precedes this. Earlier than I get to why that is thrilling, I perceive why there’s quite a lot of concern. However let me now spin that for you. Each of these issues may be true. There are lots of people which might be anxious about their jobs and the way that is going to play out and whether or not the long run is any brighter than the current. There are individuals put in cost whose job it’s to be optimistic.

Ricky Mulvey: Why do not you suppose Comcast shareholders are actually reacting to this spin off? The inventory barely budged on the information?

Invoice Barker: Nicely, they’ll spin this off. The shareholders aren’t actually going to wind up with something that completely different than what they began with. They’ll have Comcast impartial of the spin off and the spin off. They will have a bit of little bit of each and each of them will be capable of pursue their very own agendas. It is marginally good, I feel, if that they had conflicting agendas, ones which the capital allocation selections have been affected by any politics or any inside strife. It is marginally optimistic to shareholders however not a lot. You are actually you personal the identical issues however in a special package deal.

Ricky Mulvey: The inventory has barely budged up to now 5 years however it has paid a dividend. In 2014, Comcast paid a dividend of 45 cents a share. In 2024, that is $1.24. They’re making an attempt to make use of their stability sheet to return capital to shareholders and typically mature firms returning capitals to shareholders may be fantastic inventory investments. However is there something about this firm that will get you as a long run inventory investor?

Invoice Barker: No. Not me. There are these which might be . In the event you’re speaking about RemainCo, so you’ve got acquired SpinCo. That is what’s being spun off and RemainCo, what stays. It has been a properly run firm. It is doing issues with Web with Cable bundling that folks will proceed to make use of, and definitely the Web, there’s some pricing energy for the time being there. However I feel that they’re extra trying like a utility than they used to.

Ricky Mulvey: I need to transfer on rapidly to this MicroStrategy story as a result of Invoice, that is wild. MicroStrategy, which is a Bitcoin holding firm with a facet of enterprise software program has introduced that it’s going to supply institutional buyers the chance to purchase convertible bonds. It is 0% curiosity. They will promote about two-and-a-half billion value of those bonds. It is 0% curiosity so it may well purchase Bitcoin. To begin with, how do convertible bonds work and is it frequent for these bonds to pay nothing in curiosity? Once you consider bonds you consider getting a bit of paycheck till the corporate pays again the worth of the bond.

Invoice Barker: Nicely, it’s not frequent to have 0% curiosity. A bond is sort of a common bond in different circumstances and pays curiosity to bondholders and on prime of that has the choice for conversion of the bonds into inventory below sure eventualities. You do not have to supply as excessive a yield fee although the bond, the coupon would not should be as excessive since you’ve acquired this kicker of some fairness conversion alternatives. Micro technique is 0%, there have been conversion methods and possibly there’s quite a lot of wonderful print that you just acquired to undergo.

Do your homework on this one however you are betting on the worth of Bitcoin held by MicroStrategy in some way making you cash as a result of the conversion alternatives on this one embrace dates out in 2028 and 2029 and MicroStrategy having the ability to convert into money or a mix of money and fairness relying on its worth and what it appears like doing. Purchaser beware on this one. However there are numerous patrons at present as there are for just about something that has the residue of Bitcoin upon it.

Ricky Mulvey: As a substitute of simply the residue of Bitcoin, why not simply purchase the factor, and even an ETF? I do not perceive why an institutional investor would do the loop de loop of shopping for a convertible debt for micro technique to go purchase Bitcoin that they’ll then return every time they really feel prefer it as an alternative of simply shopping for Bitcoin.

Invoice Barker: Nicely, I feel you’ve got raised an excellent level. I am not going to come back out and defend what they’ve achieved. Though MicroStrategy has achieved this very successfully thus far there’s additionally a means through which it operates as a hedge towards the precise direct holding of MicroStrategy so you’ll be able to offset it with the convertible bond and scale back your threat. As a result of MicroStrategy has such a risky inventory worth that in the event you maintain quite a lot of it then it’s possible you’ll need to hedge that with this. It isn’t one thing that explains itself on the primary learn I’d say. However as you level out there’s institutional curiosity and I feel a part of it’s the hedging methods made accessible by way of this.

Ricky Mulvey: Very similar to watching Combat Membership. It modifications each time you watch it. I additionally need to do a fast word. It isn’t anytime MicroStrategy desires. There are guidelines of when it may well name again the bond, “Topic to sure circumstances on or after December 4th, 2026, MicroStrategy might redeem for money all or any portion of the notes at a redemption worth equal principally to the principal quantity.” I acquired to get that one proper if I am speaking about debt securities. Anyway, Invoice Barker, recognize you being right here. Glad to have you ever again.

Invoice Barker: Thanks. Thanks for having me.

Ricky Mulvey: How a few REIT with no Chief Funding Officer? That truly is perhaps an excellent factor. Up subsequent, Anand Chokkavelu hosts Matt Argersinger and Anthony Schiavone for a Scoreboard episode Breaking Down EastGroup Properties. Premium Motley Idiot members get entry to all Scoreboard episodes within the video library. However even in the event you’re not a member, and by the way in which, try to be a member. It is a good way to get premium protection of shares and funding evaluation. Anyway, in the event you’re not a member, you’ll be able to watch this one in full on YouTube, I will embrace the hyperlink and share this.

As we speak’s present is delivered to you by Vanta. Proving belief is extra essential than ever, particularly relating to your safety program. Vanta helps centralize program necessities and automate proof assortment for frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27OO1, HIPAA, and extra so that you save money and time and construct buyer belief. With Vanta, you get steady visibility into the state of your controls. Be a part of greater than 8,000 world firms, together with Atlassian, Movement Well being, and Quora, who belief Vanta to handle threat and show safety in actual time. Now that is a brand new solution to GRC. Get $1,000 off Vanta whenever you go to vanta.com/idiot. That is vanta.com/idiot for $1,000 off.

Anand Chokkavelu: Welcome to the newest Motley Idiot Scoreboard. I am Anand Chokkavelu. We have got longtime Fools, Anthony Schiavone and Matt Argersinger, giving a 1-10 ranking to the Solar Belt space centered industrial REIT that I’ll or might not have thought made backpacks. It is EastGroup Properties, ticker image EGP, as at all times, we’ll fee EastGroup Properties enterprise, its administration, and its financials. We’ll speak valuation. If there’s time Fools, play armchair CEO, and we are going to prime it in about 12 minutes or much less, possibly even shorter. Let’s get to it. Matt, how do you fee the energy of EastGroup’s enterprise, together with components like its trade and its competitors? Scale of 1-10, 10 is invincible, one is hopeless.

Matt Argersinger: Nicely, Anand, I am going with eight fairly excessive for EastGroup Properties. As you talked about, it is an industrial REIT. It’s largely centered on the Solar Belt. Most of its properties, nearly all of its properties are shallow bay, distribution oriented suppose warehouses, logistics amenities in what they name final mile areas. Actually strategic actual property, that is essential for 3 huge traits that I will speak about which one being the apparent one is e-commerce. We live in a an increasing number of e-commerce world. An increasing number of retail gross sales are being pushed after all by on-line gross sales, that matches completely into EastGroup’s technique. The second huge pattern is, you stated at Solar Belt, they derive about 70% of their working revenue from states like Texas, Florida, Arizona, North Carolina. These are among the many quickest rising states within the nation. That is the place lots of people are transferring to, quite a lot of companies are going to. That is an enormous tailwind for them. Then put up COVID we have seen this really want for firms to actually optimize their provide chains, have larger stock ratios, observe what they name simply in case stock administration.

God, that is one other huge enormous tailwind for EastGroup Properties. I’d say one reservation I’ve about EastGroup and why I do not give it 9 or 10 is they’re among the many smaller REITS. They’re a big industrial REIT however they’re nonetheless lower than a tenth of the dimensions of Prologis, for instance. It is nonetheless a extremely fragmented market with a lot of provide and so they’re very growth centered at EastGroup. It is extra capital intensive than possibly different REITs. That is why I am giving eight out of 10.

Anthony Schiavone: I will go along with the seven for EastGroup’s enterprise. Matt, you talked about quite a lot of the foremost issues, however one other factor that I like about EastGroup is that about 50% of their portfolio has been developed internally. I feel that is actually essential as a result of they’ll design the properties to their specs that may construct them for the long run. Then the opposite factor that I like about them too is that they’ve probably the most diversified tenant base out of, I feel any industrial REIT. Their prime 10 tenants account for just below 8% of their whole annualized base lease. I feel that is actually essential. Then except for the e-commerce and migration traits that you just talked about earlier I simply suppose industrial actual property is an advantaged property sort. If you consider a warehouse, it is simply 4 partitions. You will have a ceiling, you’ve got a roof. There’s not quite a lot of recurring capital expenditures concerned with sustaining a warehouse. That enables more money to finally be returned to shareholders. I will solely give it a seven as a result of this enterprise is a bit of bit reliant on outdoors forces that are not essentially throughout the firm’s management so you consider provide and demand fundamentals, the well being of the financial system and migration traits as properly though these have been optimistic lately however I will settle with a seven.

Anand Chokkavelu: Given its smaller measurement, that diversification, Anthony, that you just have been speaking about actually provides me some consolation the place it is not simply reliant on, you will not need to see 32% is from this one huge tech firm. Let’s transfer on to administration, Matt. Scale of 1-10, 10 is Warren Buffett, after all, and one is Homer Simpson.

Matt Argersinger: I is perhaps a bit of excessive right here however I am going 9 out of 10 Anand, and that is as a result of I am simply actually impressed by CEO Marshall Loeb and what he is achieved. His tenure goes again to 1991 with EastGroup Properties. He was with the corporate for the primary 10 years of his profession. He went off to be an govt at a few different publicly traded REITs earlier than rejoining EastGroup in 2015 after which turning into its CEO in January 2016. Since Loeb grew to become CEO in January 2016, EastGroup has outperformed the S&P 500 by greater than 80 share factors. That is onerous to do as a REIT, particularly lately, actual property has been in a fairly large bear market, EastGroup has continued to outperform and ship superb returns. I will steal a web page from Ant’s playbook right here. However one of many nice methods you’ll be able to measure a REITs administration is how they’ve grown the dividend versus the remainder of the corporate. EastGroup has grown its dividend by about 13% annualized fee over the past 10 years. Over that very same span, EastGroup shares excellent and whole debt excellent have each elevated at simply round 5% yearly. The dividend progress is growth means forward of these vital capital components of the corporate. I feel that is a very robust signal of administration so I am very impressed right here.

Anthony Schiavone: I am additionally going to go excessive right here at an eight. Matt you talked about Marshall Loeb simply been an amazing CEO since he is been there. I additionally like trying on the proxy assertion too for REITs as a result of on the finish of the day they’re allocating capital, and that is what we have to deal with as REITs buyers. In the event you have a look at their compensation incentives, they’re primarily based on FFO per share, so per share metric, that is good, primarily based on SAM property NOI progress, after which a few stability sheet metrics like debt to EBITDA and stuck cost protection ratios in addition to whole shareholder returns. I feel it is uncommon for a REIT administration staff to be compensated on stability sheet metrics. I feel that is positively an excellent signal. Then one thing distinctive about EastGroup’s administration staff that you just actually do not see in another REIT is that they do not have a chief funding officer. I discover that fascinating. All the event, all of the acquisition, all of the disposition exercise is determined by the native groups which might be working these property. I feel that is good for expertise growth too. Like, Marshall Loeb was in command of that at one level in his profession at EastGroup. I similar to how that EastGroup has a decentralized tradition. The one cause I gave him an eight is due to low insider possession at solely round 1.5% of shares excellent. That tends to be pretty frequent for REITs simply because the way in which they’re structured so I will go along with an eight.

Anand Chokkavelu: Financials Matt. A ten is a fortress, a one is yikes.

Matt Argersinger: I am shelling out one other 9 right here. Simply fast monetary snapshot of EastGroup, taking a look at simply the second quarter outcomes, the latest outcomes, the working portfolio was 97% occupied as of the tip of June, rental charges, new and renewing leases up 60%. That is an unbelievable similar property internet revenue of 5% funds from operations which is the important thing measure of REIT’s money movement. That was up eight-and-a-half p.c. I can not recall 1 / 4 going again a few years the place EastGroup has not proven progress in funds from operations per share. The enterprise is performing very well. In the event you have a look at the stability sheet you’ve got acquired debt to whole market cap of simply 16.9%. Debt to EBITDA is lower than 4x. Each of those metrics are very robust for REIT, and with rates of interest headed decrease now, EastGroup’s stability sheet is barely going to get de dangers and their liquidity is barely going to get larger. I simply suppose they’re in a very nice place financially.

Anthony Schiavone: I will go along with an eight for the financials. Matt, you talked about the FFO per share progress, the earnings progress. That earnings progress has led to phenomenal dividend progress as properly. EastGroup has paid a dividend for 179 consecutive quarters. They’ve additionally elevated or maintained their dividend for 31 consecutive years together with will increase in every of the final 13 years. This can be a regular dividend grower. You may see that money that they generate flowing again to shareholders which we like to see. In August, they elevated their dividend by greater than 10%. That is an excellent signal. Over the past 10 years they’ve grown their dividend by nearly 150%. Actually spectacular there. Matt, you talked about a robust stability sheet too. Debt to EBITDA is an all time finest for the corporate. Their debt to market cap under 20%. Sometimes, within the non-public actual property market, you may sometimes see loading the values nearer to 60% or 70%. This can be a very properly capitalized firm. I solely give them an eight due to their measurement, which you talked about earlier, Matt. There’s a bit of bit smaller. They cannot essentially get the perfect phrases, the perfect rates of interest on new debt that they concern, like someone like a Prologis can. That is the one cause why I give them an eight however positively a robust firm right here.

Anand Chokkavelu: You may inform how a lot they like the corporate as a result of they’re each apologizing once they give an eight. [LAUGHTER] Let’s speak valuation. How properly will EastGroup inventory do over the following 5 years, and the way secure is it? Maintaining in thoughts that 10 is a positive factor, one is a lottery ticket.

Anthony Schiavone: Sure, over the past 5, 10, 15, and 20 yr intervals, EastGroup has delivered a compound annual whole return north of 10%. I will go between 10 and 15% annualized over the following 5 years. As we speak, in the event you have a look at its dividend yields at a yield of about 3%, it is rising its dividend at a ten% fee. Theoretically that ought to produce a complete return of round 13%. I feel that is affordable and then you definitely issue within the tailwinds of e-commerce, Solar Belt migration, among the lease progress that is already embedded in its under market leases that it has inside its portfolio, I feel that is going to result in a minimum of double digit returns from right here.

Matt Argersinger: I am additionally going 10-15%. I am a seven when it comes to my confidence with that. The valuation is a bit of excessive, in the event you have a look at what they’re guiding for FFO per share this yr. The inventory proper now could be buying and selling round 22, 23 instances that determine. That is a bit of excessive though I feel EastGroup does deserve a premium. As Ant talked about, dividend yield is true round 3%. You add that to the dividend progress or to the FFO per share progress. Simple to see double digit returns right here. However valuation is a bit of excessive so I am not tremendous assured in it however I will give it a seven for that.

Anthony Schiavone: I ought to say, I do not suppose I discussed. I am additionally going with the seven due to the valuation.

Anand Chokkavelu: We’ll skip armchair CEO within the curiosity of time and go straight to everybody’s favourite prime it. I count on to listen to Prologis someplace in right here. Anthony, is there an organization in EastGroup Properties house that you just like higher?

Anthony Schiavone: Yeah, there’s this firm known as Prologis. That is my prime it. Only a huge firm. I feel it has a market cap of over $100 billion however I nonetheless do not suppose the market totally grasps simply how robust this firm actually is with its administration staff, its stability sheet, simply every little thing concerned with the corporate. It is simply phenomenal.

Matt Argersinger: I acquired to say Prologis, as properly. Actual property measurement does make an enormous distinction for returns. As Ant talked about earlier, entry to the capital markets. Prologis is the decide. I like EastGroup and I personal each EastGroup and Prologis. But when I needed to decide one, I might most likely go to Prologis.

Ricky Mulvey: As at all times, individuals on this system might have pursuits within the shares they speak about and the Motley Idiot might have formal suggestions for or towards, so you do not purchase or promote shares primarily based solely on what you hear. All private finance content material follows Motley Idiot editorial requirements and will not be accredited by advertisers. The Motley Idiot solely picks merchandise that it could personally suggest to pals such as you. I am Ricky Mulvey. Thanks for listening. We’ll be again tomorrow.

Anand Chokkavelu, CFA has positions in Bitcoin and Prologis. Anthony Schiavone has positions in Superior Micro Gadgets and Prologis. Bill Barker has positions in GE Aerospace and Nvidia. Matthew Argersinger has positions in Atlassian, EastGroup Properties, and Prologis and has the next choices: quick January 2025 $110 places on Prologis. Ricky Mulvey has positions in Prologis. The Motley Idiot has positions in and recommends Superior Micro Gadgets, Atlassian, Bitcoin, Nvidia, and Prologis. The Motley Idiot recommends Comcast, EastGroup Properties, GE Aerospace, and WK Kellogg and recommends the next choices: lengthy January 2026 $90 calls on Prologis. The Motley Idiot has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the writer and don’t essentially mirror these of Nasdaq, Inc.