Wanting on the underlying holdings of the ETFs in our protection universe at ETF Channel, we now have in contrast the buying and selling worth of every holding in opposition to the common analyst 12-month ahead goal worth, and computed the weighted common implied analyst goal worth for the ETF itself. For the Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (Image: IVOO), we discovered that the implied analyst goal worth for the ETF based mostly upon its underlying holdings is $122.47 per unit.
With IVOO buying and selling at a current worth close to $99.84 per unit, that implies that analysts see 22.67% upside for this ETF wanting by means of to the common analyst targets of the underlying holdings. Three of IVOO’s underlying holdings with notable upside to their analyst goal costs are Avis Funds Group Inc (Image: CAR), MKS Devices Inc (Image: MKSI), and Marriott Holidays Worldwide Corp. (Image: VAC). Though CAR has traded at a current worth of $60.65/share, the common analyst goal is 87.14% increased at $113.50/share. Equally, MKSI has 52.33% upside from the current share worth of $88.17 if the common analyst goal worth of $134.31/share is reached, and analysts on common expect VAC to succeed in a goal worth of $100.09/share, which is 52.00% above the current worth of $65.85. Under is a twelve month worth historical past chart evaluating the inventory efficiency of CAR, MKSI, and VAC:
Under is a abstract desk of the present analyst goal costs mentioned above:
Title | Image | Current Value | Avg. Analyst 12-Mo. Goal | % Upside to Goal |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | IVOO | $99.84 | $122.47 | 22.67% |
Avis Funds Group Inc | CAR | $60.65 | $113.50 | 87.14% |
MKS Devices Inc | MKSI | $88.17 | $134.31 | 52.33% |
Marriott Holidays Worldwide Corp. | VAC | $65.85 | $100.09 | 52.00% |
Are analysts justified in these targets, or overly optimistic about the place these shares will likely be buying and selling 12 months from now? Do the analysts have a sound justification for his or her targets, or are they behind the curve on current firm and business developments? A excessive worth goal relative to a inventory’s buying and selling worth can mirror optimism concerning the future, however will also be a precursor to focus on worth downgrades if the targets have been a relic of the previous. These are questions that require additional investor analysis.
10 ETFs With Most Upside To Analyst Targets »
Additionally see:
KTOS YTD Return
SCUA YTD Return
Funds Holding CASA
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the creator and don’t essentially mirror these of Nasdaq, Inc.