Trying on the underlying holdings of the ETFs in our protection universe at ETF Channel, we have now in contrast the buying and selling worth of every holding in opposition to the typical analyst 12-month ahead goal worth, and computed the weighted common implied analyst goal worth for the ETF itself. For the American Century U.S. High quality Development ETF (Image: QGRO), we discovered that the implied analyst goal worth for the ETF primarily based upon its underlying holdings is $111.50 per unit.
With QGRO buying and selling at a latest worth close to $101.26 per unit, that implies that analysts see 10.11% upside for this ETF trying by means of to the typical analyst targets of the underlying holdings. Three of QGRO’s underlying holdings with notable upside to their analyst goal costs are Qualys, Inc. (Image: QLYS), Gilead Sciences Inc (Image: GILD), and Paycom Software program Inc (Image: PAYC). Though QLYS has traded at a latest worth of $134.42/share, the typical analyst goal is 11.40% greater at $149.75/share. Equally, GILD has 11.10% upside from the latest share worth of $89.14 if the typical analyst goal worth of $99.04/share is reached, and analysts on common predict PAYC to achieve a goal worth of $220.92/share, which is 10.78% above the latest worth of $199.42. Under is a twelve month worth historical past chart evaluating the inventory efficiency of QLYS, GILD, and PAYC:
Under is a abstract desk of the present analyst goal costs mentioned above:
| Identify | Image | Current Value | Avg. Analyst 12-Mo. Goal | % Upside to Goal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Century U.S. High quality Development ETF | QGRO | $101.26 | $111.50 | 10.11% |
| Qualys, Inc. | QLYS | $134.42 | $149.75 | 11.40% |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | GILD | $89.14 | $99.04 | 11.10% |
| Paycom Software program Inc | PAYC | $199.42 | $220.92 | 10.78% |
Are analysts justified in these targets, or overly optimistic about the place these shares will probably be buying and selling 12 months from now? Do the analysts have a legitimate justification for his or her targets, or are they behind the curve on latest firm and trade developments? A excessive worth goal relative to a inventory’s buying and selling worth can mirror optimism in regards to the future, however may also be a precursor to focus on worth downgrades if the targets have been a relic of the previous. These are questions that require additional investor analysis.
10 ETFs With Most Upside To Analyst Targets »
Additionally see:
MRCC Videos
Institutional Holders of ASM
Funds Holding ETR
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the writer and don’t essentially mirror these of Nasdaq, Inc.
