(RTTNews) – The Federal Commerce Fee mentioned it’s taking motion in opposition to Invitation Properties Inc. (INVH), the biggest landlord of single-family houses within the nation, for a spread of illegal practices in opposition to shoppers. These embrace deceptive renters about lease prices, charging undisclosed junk charges, failing to examine houses earlier than residents moved in, and unfairly withholding safety deposits upon move-out.
Invitation Properties has agreed to a proposed settlement that mandates the corporate pay $48 million to refund shoppers harmed by its actions. The settlement may also require the company landlord to obviously disclose its leasing costs, set up honest insurance policies and procedures for dealing with safety deposit refunds, and stop different illegal behaviors.
The FTC’s criticism alleges that Invitation Properties marketed month-to-month rental charges that failed to incorporate obligatory junk charges that might whole greater than $1,700 yearly. Shoppers in search of rental homes paid nonrefundable charges—together with software charges as much as $55 and reservation charges as much as $500—based mostly on the deceptively marketed charges. Shoppers discovered that the worth can be larger than marketed solely once they obtained a replica of their lease, and typically not even till after they signed the lease. These undisclosed charges ranged from “companies” corresponding to “good residence” expertise and “utility administration,” to air filter supply and web packages. Renters couldn’t decide out of paying these charges. Since 2019, Invitation Properties has collected greater than $18 million in software charges alone for deceptively priced homes.
Between 2021 and June 2023, the criticism alleges, Invitation Properties charged shoppers tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in junk charges as a part of their month-to-month rental funds. The criticism cites a 2019 electronic mail from Invitation Properties’ CEO calling on the senior vp chargeable for overseeing the corporate’s payment program to “juice this hog” by making the good residence payment obligatory for renters.
The criticism additionally factors to a number of instances the corporate actively selected to not disclose the charges previous to shoppers paying nonrefundable software and reservation charges, regardless of the corporate receiving quite a few complaints in regards to the charges after renters discovered their precise month-to-month lease costs had been larger than marketed.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the writer and don’t essentially mirror these of Nasdaq, Inc.
