A U.S. chapter court docket in Texas has rejected Johnson & Johnson’s JNJ subsidiary Purple River Talc’s request to approve its prepackaged chapter plan. The corporate mentioned the plan included one of many largest settlements in mass tort chapter historical past and was backed by most claimants.
In October 2024, the Division of Justice’s unit argued that Johnson & Johnson’s newest chapter maneuver is a bad-faith try to defend itself from billions in private harm claims with out really coming into chapter.
As a substitute of interesting the choice, Purple River Talc will return to the court docket system to combat what it calls baseless talc-related lawsuits.
The corporate claims that disclosures through the chapter course of confirmed the litigation is pushed by plaintiff legal professionals, primarily based on flawed science and funded by exterior traders, together with international sovereign wealth funds.
Additionally Learn: Justice Division’s Trustee Program Alleges Johnson & Johnson’s Talc Litigation Chapter Bid Is Unhealthy-Religion Tactic To Keep away from Legal responsibility
In consequence, the corporate has no plans to settle and can reverse about $7 billion beforehand put aside for authorized prices.
“The Court docket has sadly allowed a few legislation corporations with financially conflicted motives, who’ve conceded they haven’t recovered a dime for his or her shoppers in a decade of litigation, to defeat the overwhelming want of claimants. As now we have repeatedly acknowledged, within the absence of plan affirmation, we’ll vigorously current our case within the tort system, beginning with the adjudication of the motions pending within the Multi-District Litigation to exclude plaintiffs’ specialists and to disqualify the lead counsel for its unethical breaches,” mentioned Erik Haas, Worldwide VP of Litigation, Johnson & Johnson. “We prevailed in 16 of 17 ovarian instances tried within the final 11 years and can commit our efforts to defeating these pretend claims.”
“At this time’s determination highlights the damaged tort system in the US. The corporate reiterates that not one of the talc-related claims towards it have benefit and makes an attempt to resolve this litigation have been geared toward shifting previous this problem,” Haas continued. “The choice to litigate each filed case is predicated on the straightforward indisputable fact that this can be a pretend declare created by grasping plaintiff legal professionals searching for one other deep pocket to sue and fueled by litigation-financed lawyer promoting.”
In September, Johnson & Johnson reportedly elevated its settlement supply by $1 billion, now totaling about $9 billion, to handle claims that its talc child powder induced gynecological most cancers.
Value Motion: JNJ inventory is down 3.48% at $160.07 through the premarket session on the final test Tuesday.
Learn Subsequent:
Photograph: Shutterstock
Momentum66.32
Progress50.75
High quality26.16
Worth20.62
Market Information and Information delivered to you by Benzinga APIs
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga doesn’t present funding recommendation. All rights reserved.